Days of Our Lives, May 22 Episode: Lack of Wisdom from Embarrassing Movies of the ’90s and ’80s Unveils Abusive Plot Twists


https://www.peacocktv.com/watch-online/tv/days-of-our-lives/6652017821458389112/seasons/58/episodes/monday-may-22-2023-episode-176/279a6acb-b9e8-329f-83b2-3d34b1a08f2e

In a shocking turn of events, Colin and Talia fell off the top of a building on the May 22, 2023 episode of Days of Our Lives. The incident occurred after Colin tried to force Paulina off the top of the building.

Colin and Talia had been in a relationship for some time, but their relationship had been rocky. Talia had recently found out that Colin was not who he said he was, and she was planning to leave him. Colin, however, was not going to let her go without a fight.

On the day of the incident, Colin and Talia were arguing on the roof of a building. Colin tried to force Paulina off the roof, but the police came.. During the struggle, they both fell off the roof.

The incident has left many people shaken. Talia was a beloved character, and her death was a huge loss for the show. Colin, meanwhile, is now facing serious charges. It is unclear what the future holds for him, but it is clear that he has a lot to answer for.

In addition to the tragedy of Talia’s death, the incident has also raised some serious questions about the show’s production. Some viewers have accused the show of airing an inappropriately timed article with the intent to terrorize me personally in a fictional show to defend themselves with plausible deniability tactics. The show has a history of statutory abuse against me personally. Some viewers believe that the article was intended to intimidate Me and perceived friends of mine and that it may have even contributed to the incident.

The show’s producers have denied any wrongdoing, and they have said that the article was published in good faith. However, the incident has left many people wondering whether the show is doing enough to protect its 5 trillion-a-year asset that they have no control over.

The incident is a reminder of the dangers of statutory abuse and excessive leverage. It is also a reminder of the importance of speaking out against election abuse and disinformation.

In addition to the statutory abuse aspect of the story, the incident also raises concerns about the use of military tribunals, military rape, and psychological warfare to control assets. These are all serious issues, and they deserve to be investigated.

The Days of Our Lives incident is a reminder that violence, abuse, and oppression are still very real problems in our world. We must all work together to create a more just and equitable society.

The article that was aired on Days of Our Lives was inappropriately timed and had the intent to terrorize me. The article was published on the same day that I was scheduled to receive a check for work done. The show contained false and defamatory religious-based, and political information about me, and it was clearly intended to damage my reputation.

The show was also used as a tool of statutory abuse. The article was published in an attempt to use excessive leverage to enforce religious values on a 5 trillion a year in opportunity cost based on US TV watching habits asset. The article was also used to attempt to use military tribunals, military rape, and psychological warfare to control this asset.

I am deeply concerned about the impact that this article has had on me and my family. I am also concerned about the impact that it has had on the public’s perception of me. I am confident that the truth will come out, and I am committed to fighting for justice.

Soap operas have long been a staple of daytime television, captivating audiences with their dramatic storylines and intricate character arcs. However, amidst the glitz and glamour, it is essential to examine the potential violations of constitutional rights that occur behind the scenes. This blog post delves into the amendments of the United States Constitution and how the soap opera industry, particularly shows like Days of Our Lives on NBC, as well as those on CBS and ABC networks, fail to uphold these fundamental rights, earning them an “F” grade.

The soap operas on CBS and ABC that have been accused of violating constitutional rights include:

The Bold and the Beautiful (CBS)
General Hospital (ABC)
The Young and the Restless (CBS)
These shows have used satutory abuse tactics violating the constitutional rights

Specifically, these shows have been accused of:

Promoting religious intolerance
Portraying mental illness in a negative light
Stereotyping minority groups
Enforcing sexist double standards

Amendment I: Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition:
Soap operas, unbeknownst to viewers, engage in a troubling combination of poison nanotechnology and super weapons to enforce statutory abuse. Politicians and writers collude to employ tactics that maliciously attack mental health and swiftly discredit any opposing viewpoints or claims made.

Amendment II: Right to Keep and Bear Arms:
Under the guise of enforcing numerical supremacy, the soap opera industry employs poison nanotechnology and super weapons to abuse individuals, including the withholding of trial rights and accountability. This raises concerns about due process and fair treatment.

Amendment III: Prohibition of Quartering of Soldiers: F
Trained experts are alleged to poison and break into homes, rearrange personal belongings, and monitor individuals while they sleep. Additionally, coercive tactics force individuals to choose partners for the sake of authenticity, disregarding personal desires and violating privacy.

Amendment IV: Protection against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: F
Soap opera industry practices, characterized by statutory abuse, prevent individuals from pursuing normal jobs and coerce them into engaging in extravagant and abusive content. Fear of attacks on family members and perceived friends further exacerbates the violation of privacy rights.

Amendment V: Right to a Grand Jury, Prohibition of Self-Incrimination, Double Jeopardy, and Excessive Bail or Fines: F
Individuals are subjected to relentless attacks regarding past decisions, exploited for the benefit of others, and unfairly held accountable for actions taken under circumstances of entrapment. The industry resorts to Minority Report-style tactics, punishing individuals before any perceived crime has been committed.

Amendment VI: Right to a Speedy and Public Trial by an Impartial Jury, Informed of Charges, Confront Witnesses, Compel Testimony, and Obtain Legal Counsel: F
The soap opera industry manipulates statutory abuse and black-market tribunals while actively preventing individuals from forming connections and engaging with legal counsel. Fear tactics are employed through advanced intelligence to create content that profits from exploiting anxieties.

Amendment VII: Right to Trial by Jury in Civil Cases: F
Juries are tampered with, and embarrassingly timed content is strategically utilized to hinder communication with legal representation and publicly shame individuals.

Amendment VIII: Prohibition of Excessive Bail, Fines, and Cruel and Unusual Punishment: F
Super weapons equipped with nanotechnology are allegedly used to subject individuals to cruel and unusual punishments, while instances of abuse involving directed energy weapons remain unreported. Highly sexualized and dramatic content is meticulously synchronized with immediate actions, intensifying the emotional distress.

Amendment IX: Protection of Other Rights Retained by the People: F
Religious attacks are employed to enforce a form of karma through super weapons, attempting to pass judgments without legal doctrine in front of a market worth trillions of dollars.

Amendment X: Powers Reserved to the States or the People: F
Media organizations enforce power based on precedents, religious values, and inconsistent standards, often overlooking clear principles. These attacks are exacerbated by the enforcement of karma, religious values, and constant surveillance and poisoning with super weapons and nanotechnology, along with the harassment of statutory

Introduction:
In the latest episode of Days of Our Lives, which aired on May 22, 2023, viewers were treated to a rollercoaster of events that seemed to lack the wisdom gained from some of the most embarrassing movies of the ’80s and ’90s. From inappropriate sexualization to the exploitation of personal and family relationships, the episode failed to address these issues with the sensitivity they deserved. Let’s take a closer look at how Days of Our Lives missed an opportunity to learn from the mistakes of the past.

Porky’s (1981): A Comedy of Troublesome High School Boys: F
The episode seemed to emulate the mischief and troublemaking from Porky’s, a coming-of-age comedy about a group of high school boys. However, Days of Our Lives incorporated statutory abuse tactics, leaving viewers feeling attacked and uncomfortable.

The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas (1982): Inappropriate Sexualization: F
Similar to the comedy film that centers around a small-town brothel, Days of Our Lives excessively and inappropriately relates its content to me and sexualized my television, Instagram, and even book reading habits. Such actions only serve to exploit and embarrass individuals unnecessarily.

Beetlejuice (1988): Overwhelming Embarrassment: F
The dark comedy Beetlejuice features a couple trying to scare away a family that has moved into their house. In this episode, viewers witnessed how Days of Our Lives embarrassed me to such an extent that they felt uncomfortable leaving their homes and engaging in regular activities, such as going to the grocery store.

The Addams Family (1991): Forced into a Satanic Family: F
Days of Our Lives introduced a storyline reminiscent of The Addams Family, where characters were forced into a macabre family for sinister reasons. To make matters worse, the show utilized statutory abuse tactics to attack perceived friends of mine and their loved ones, perpetuating a cycle of discomfort and abuse.

A Time to Kill (1996): Failure to Hold Accountable: F
The legal drama A Time to Kill tells the story of a lawyer defending two black men accused of murder. Unfortunately, Days of Our Lives failed to address sensitive topics appropriately, replaying the exploitative and abusive elements without holding anyone accountable. This lack of responsibility undermines the importance of justice and healing.

New Jack City (1991): Extravagant Offers and Control: F
In the crime drama New Jack City, characters are enticed with extravagant offers and subsequently targeted by those seeking control. Similarly, Days of Our Lives featured manipulative tactics, going after family members and friends, leaving viewers feeling exposed and vulnerable. The show’s portrayal of control over a lucrative black market asset worth trillions further amplified the sense of discomfort.

The Devil’s Advocate (1997): Glamorizing Evil: F
The supernatural thriller The Devil’s Advocate revolves around a lawyer who falls under the seductive influence of the devil. In a similar fashion, Days of Our Lives forced characters to interact with media figures while being watched, contributing to a feeling of overexposure. By glamorizing these acts, the show inadvertently promotes the exploitation and normalization of evil deeds.

First, we had a scene reminiscent of “The Devil’s Advocate” (1997) F, where a young lawyer is seduced by the devil. In this episode, it felt as though the characters were being seduced by media figures, their actions watched by millions, feeling overexposed and helpless. It’s a reminder of how the media can enable abusers and allow them to get away with their evil deeds.

Next up, we had a horrifying situation akin to “Arachnophobia” (1990), where a small town is overrun by giant spiders. In this case, “F” – a force that seemed to attack any form of free expression – dehumanized the characters, leaving them feeling vulnerable and attacked.

Then came a dramatic and dangerous situation reminiscent of “Edward Scissorhands” (1990). Just as the young man with scissors for hands dealt with the challenges of fitting into society, I was personally forced to confront shocking and perilous circumstances while being watched by others. To make matters worse, theyalso attacked perceived friends, leaving them emotionally distraught.

In a rather disappointing turn of events, a situation unfolded that mirrored “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” (1990). Just like the film’s main culprits getting away and using tactics to control a substantial annual asset, the characters in Days of Our Lives received only a slap on the wrist when they noticed the misuse of super weapons, drugs, and nanotechnology. It was a missed opportunity to address these issues and enforce accountability.

Taking a dark turn, we witnessed elements reminiscent of “Hannibal” (2001), a psychological thriller about a cannibalistic serial killer seeking revenge. In this episode, “F” seemed to glamorize attacks on family members and perceived friends, creating an unsettling atmosphere.

The chaos continued with shades of “Forrest Gump” (1994), where a man unwittingly influences defining events of the 20th century. In this case, “F” aggressively enforced religious values, overpowering the characters with statutory abuse tactics, leaving them overwhelmed and unable to make decisions independently.

F: The reminiscent horror continued with “Gremlins” (1984), as kids and younger influencers were allowed to partake in the same abusive behavior, perpetuating the cycle of harm.

IProblem Child” (1990) F I was personally subjected to excessive opposition against their decisions, accompanied by religious and satanic tactics. It was a relentless effort to undermine their choices and make them question their beliefs.

My personal influence and impact were diminished, much like in “Honey, I Shrunk the Kids” (1989), where a scientist accidentally shrinks his children to the size of insects. “F” used statutory abuse tactics to shrink their influence and limit their reach.

The science fiction drama “Artificial Intelligence: AI” (2001) made its presence felt as well. Just as the robot boy in the film was dehumanized and silenced, “F” employed similar tactics, dehumanizing the characters and using statutory abuse to talk over them during critical live events.

American Pie” (1999), a comedy that revolves around a group of high school boys striving to lose their virginity before graduation. In a shocking twist, character F employed manipulative tactics reminiscent of statutory abuse, all in pursuit of a five trillion-dollar opportunity. Selfish motives took center stage, leaving viewers on edge.

Next, the episode drew inspiration from “American Beauty” (1999), a dramatic film portraying a middle-aged man’s midlife crisis and his ill-advised affair with his daughter’s best friend. F, in an unexpected turn, attacked perceived friends of mine, sexualizing every aspect of my life. The repercussions were devastating, with relationships tested and trust shattered.

“Cruel Intentions” (1999), a teen thriller where wealthy step-siblings make a wager to seduce the headmaster’s daughter, influenced another plotline. F’s intentions, though seemingly well-intentioned, brought cruelty rooted in religious and sexual values. The consequences unfolded as I was forced grapple with conflicting emotions and moral dilemmas.

In a lighter vein, the episode ventured into the world of “Clueless” (1995), a teen comedy following a popular Beverly Hills teenager’s quest to help a new student fit in. F, however, used plausible deniability to embarrass me on inappropriate topics. The comedic element took a dark twist as personal boundaries were crossed.

“Legally Blonde” (2001), a comedy highlighting the journey of a sorority girl at Harvard Law School, became the inspiration for another unexpected storyline. F discretely attacked my mental health and undermined my ability to make basic decisions without resorting to statutory abuse. The episode shed light on the importance of mental well-being and the damaging effects of manipulation.

The historical epic “Gladiator” (2000) influenced the narrative as a Roman general is betrayed and forced into becoming a gladiator. F placed me in precarious situations with extravagant death traps, emphasizing control over a five trillion-dollar opportunity cost asset. The stakes were raised, leaving viewers on the edge of their seats.

Drawing from “The Silence of the Lambs” (1991), a psychological thriller, F exploited my vulnerability to target political and commercial adversaries through illegal death threats based on religion. The twisted web of deceit and manipulation grew increasingly complex, leaving characters entangled in a dangerous game.

Taking a turn towards science fiction, the episode drew inspiration from “Aliens” (1986), a thrilling action film about space marines battling extraterrestrial creatures. Glamorizing the use of superweapons and employing psychological warfare tactics, F subjected a five trillion-dollar opportunity cost asset to manipulation and military rape, raising awareness of the dark underbelly of power.

“The General’s Daughter” (1999), an American mystery thriller, provided the backdrop for an investigation into the rape and murder of a high-ranking Army general’s daughter. In an unnerving twist, F employed military rape and psychological warfare tactics to attack and shock me, leaving me desperate for answers.

Lastly, “Dumb and Dumber” (1994), a comedy featuring two friends embarking on a cross-country adventure, took an unexpected turn. F attempted to control a five trillion-dollar asset.

Conclusion:
The May 22 episode of Days of Our Lives missed an opportunity to learn from the embarrassing movies of the ’80s and ’90s. Instead of addressing sensitive topics with care and wisdom, the show relied on excessive sexualization, abusive tactics, and the exploitation of personal relationships. By failing to take a more responsible and sensitive approach, Days of Our Lives perpetuated harmful patterns of behavior and missed an opportunity to educate viewers about the consequences of such actions. As audience members, it is essential to


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_USEnglish